
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION
ST. ANNE’S
CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL AND
ST. MICHAEL CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL
GUIDE FOR PARENTS/GUARDIANS
Assessment, evaluation,
grading and reporting are conducted in the faith-centred environment of Catholic
education. Teachers and
administrators affirm our Catholic values in daily classroom practice.
The Huron-Perth Catholic District School Board
P.O. Box 70 – Dublin, ON
N0K 1E0
Telephone (519) 345 – 2440
Fax (519) 345 – 2449
Website www.hpcdsb.edu.on.ca
Faith
and Learning … Celebrating the Journey.
HOW IS STUDENT PERFORMANCE ASSESSED?
Teachers assess student achievement of course expectations and demonstration of learning skills
STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT OF COURSE EXPECTATIONS
Over
the entire course, students’ achievement of expectations is assessed in four
categories:
Thinking/Inquiry
Communication
Application
Each
summative assessment activity will measure
one or more of these four categories. Students will be provided with numerous and varied
opportunities to demonstrate their achievement across all four categories.
Achievement in each category is assigned a level based on the following
provincial criteria:
Level
4 – A very high to outstanding level of achievement of the expectations.
Level 3 – A considerable level of achievement; the provincial
standard,
Level 2 – A moderate level of achievement,
Level 1 – A passable level of achievement,
Below Level 1 – Insufficient achievement of the expectations to pass.
The
teacher determines the student’s most consistent level of achievement by
evaluating the evidence collected on assessment activities throughout the
course. The individual assessment results are not averaged.
The teacher then determines where that achievement lies within the range
for that level (e.g. 3-, 3, 3+).
STUDENT
DEMONSTRATION OF LEARNING SKILLS
Learning
skills will be assessed in every course according to the criteria, which have
been clearly communicated to students. Although
learning skills have a significant impact (positive or negative) on achievement,
the evaluation of the learning skills will not be included in the determination
of the student’s percentage grade.
Five areas of Learning Skills are assessed:
Teamwork
Organization
Work Habits/Homework
Initiative
These are evaluated using a four point scale:
E – Excellent
G – Good
S – Satisfactory
N – Needs improvement
Types
of Assessment
Diagnostic
Assessment is the process of assessing what students know and are able to demonstrate prior to
instruction. This
variety of assessment helps determine starting points and helps the teacher
program appropriately for individual students. It is rarely used in determining
the student’s grade.
Formative
Assessment is the process of assessing
what students know and are able to do as they progress through the learning and practice opportunities. This
type of assessment provides ongoing, meaningful feedback to help students
improve as the learning/practice builds.
Summative Assessment is the process of assessing what students know and are able to do at certain points in the learning process. These assessments, such as end-of-unit test and performances, are used to determine the student’s grade.
Grading and Reporting At-A-Glance
Mid Term Grading
Based on professional judgement and the weight of the evidence
provided by the student, the teacher will assign a percentage grade to represent
the student’s most consistent and (where applicable) most recent overall level
of achievement. Therefore, mid-term
report card marks will be one of the following listed below.
However, for grades that will be
submitted to post-secondary destinations for the purpose of admissions –
teachers should assign grades across the full range of numerical values from 0
– 100%.
|
Level |
% Grade |
Interpretation |
|
|
4+ |
94-100 |
Higher Range
Mid Range |
Indicates solid, consistent demonstration of all indicators for the level and possibly some signs of performance at the level above. Indicates solid, consistent
demonstration of most of the indicators for the level. Indicates demonstration of some
of the indicators for the level and possibly some signs of performance at
the level below. |
|
4 |
89 |
||
|
4- |
83 |
||
|
3+ |
78 |
||
|
3 |
75 |
||
|
3- |
72 |
||
|
2+ |
68 |
||
|
2 |
65 |
||
|
2- |
62 |
||
|
1+ |
58 |
||
|
1 |
55 |
||
|
1- |
52 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
|
Indicates that
the student is able to achieve some course expectations in limited ways;
however, achievement is insufficient to warrant granting of a credit. |
|
|
|
Indicates that the student has
difficulty achieving most of the course expectations. |
||
|
|
Indicates that the student has
difficulty achieving any course expectations. |
||
|
|
Indicates that
the student has missed or failed to complete some summative evaluation
activities and that evidence of achievement is insufficient to warrant the
granting of a credit. |
||
|
|
Indicates that the student has
provided little or no evidence of achievement. |
||
The grade at the end of the semester is determined through a mathematical calculation (70% Term + 30% Final Evaluation Activity).
Assessment_Evaluation.pdf - .pdf format for Printing Brochure